![]() ![]()
Probably artifacts, most likely caused by some kind of movement. i mean SixFootTwo mentions.i thought it was just me and my lac of knowledge with the apps. I too have had these issues as (Magical Trevor). I've tried combinezm and zerene stacker and both seem to do this to a differing degree and wondered if anyone had encountered this and knew of a work around that didn't involve going in and manually correcting the fringe? Just hover to see the notes and then if you go to the larger image it's very obvious. You can see it here easily because of the white petals on the darker background Subsequently when stacking this creates a fringe effect where a feint ghost of the largest image surrounds the stacked image. When taking the images and focussing across the DoF of the object I find that the images taken grows/shrinks as you change the focus and you get a number of images each with the sharpness at a different depth (desirable) but they are of differing sizes. So a question for all on stacking and fringing. Just one comment in case someone got stuck in CS4 doing this, I just tried it out with 2 unrelated pictures and I could not see the command "auto blend" in Edit until I selected both layers at once. #Combinezm For Mac how to#Thank for such a great insight into how to get sharp and clear shots in macro! I will try both the CombineZP and also in CS4 the same. The author of zerene stacker can be found hanging about on this forum /forum/ Have to admit I really did not get on with CZM and reverted to using CZ5 before going onto zerene stacker. #Combinezm For Mac plus#Plus then theres the fact that it seems to produce better results than CZM from what I have seen of other peoples work. #Combinezm For Mac software#Very good customer support by the look of it, if this is how Zerene handles its customers I'd be very happy to pay for the software (Once its working on my PC). Emailed the error and DXdiagnostics to him and he said he'd get back to me. #Combinezm For Mac 64 Bit#I had issues after reinstalling it that Zerene tending to cause errors which is more than likely due to the fact that I am running a 64 bit machine with Vista. Secondly, I have been in touch with the Zerene people because I had issues re installing a trial, as I wanted to re-evaluate the software and make a final decision between this and CZM. I then re order the layers in PS in order and then save them out individually, all as TIFFs.ĬZM then seems to produce better results. Generally I now stack my photos within PS CS 4 first and crop the photo so that CZM doesnt end up having to work with non-existant edges. I have used CombineZM enough times now to become half decent with the software but I have found that if you are using CZM that the stack & alignment within PS CS4 seems to be a lot more capable in my view. Yes F0 just means no aperture reading available. I think f/0.0 is caused by the camera not been able to read the lens settings due to reversal of lens of some other attachment ? LordV i have a question, how come some of the aperture in macro photography is F0.0, is there a special tool to obtain that aperture? Now I can try to focus stack my macro photos to make a super photo! Thanks for the links! Thank you for this terrific information! I've been having a focus problem with my new Raynox DCR-250. Nicolamarini79 edited this topic ages ago. Īnd quite the same but made as usual by hand and in a more artistic way. ![]() I d usually done this without know that there are programs that do this. My original unstacked file from yesterday:Īnd my Focus Stacked (6 frames) image from today:ĭoesn't matter how you do the stacking really- it's just the idea, however I have found zerene stacker (google it) is very good. >scripts>Load files into stack, making sure you check "attempt to align layers" box I use the freeware Programme combinez5 to do this available from here It is best done on a tripod but can be done handholding as long as the FOV is reasonably consistent. This is achieved either by moving the camera or by using the focus ring. #Combinezm For Mac series#It is done by taking a series of picures of the subject from the same point of view but at different focus depths covering the area you want in focus. Thought I'd knock up an example of this as there are always a few questions about it.įocus stacking is simply used to increase the DOF in a picture which can be a major problem in taking macro shots. I've just done a more complete focus stacking tutorial with a better example here ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |